|
|
Registros recuperados : 189 | |
43. | | GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; MANZZIONI, A.; ARRUABARRENA, A.; LADO, J.; VICENTE, E.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; LENZI, A. Avances en el mejoramiento genético de tomate. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2018, no. 54, p. 42-44. (Revista INIA; 54)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
44. | | LADO, J.; MOLTINI, A.; PINTOS, P.; LUQUE, E.; VICENTE, E.; GHELFI, B.; MANZZIONI, A.; ARES, G. Porque el sabor importa: la evaluación sensorial integrada al mejoramiento genético de hortalizas uruguayas. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2018, no. 55, p. 31-34. (Revista INIA; 55).Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
45. | | VICENTE, E.; MANZZIONI, A.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; LADO, J.; ARRUABARRENA, A.; RUBIO, L.; SILVERA, E.; VARELA, P. El cultivar de frutilla para cultivo protegido INIA Ágata (SGN48.3). Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2017. 4 p. (Hoja de Divulgación; 108)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
48. | | KIRSCHBAUM, D.S.; VICENTE, E.; CANO-TORRES, M.A.; GAMBARDELLA, M.; VEIZAGA-PINTO, F.K.; ANTUNES, L.E.C. Strawberry in South America: From the Caribbean to Patagonia. (Conference Paper). Acta Horticulturae, 2017, Number 1156, Pages 947-956. (Acta Horticulturae; 1156) In: Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1156: VIII International Strawberry Symposium. Conveners: Y. Desjardins, A. Gosselin. Editor: Y. Desjardins. Publication date: 20 April 2017.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
49. | | ARRUABARRENA, A.; SALVO, M.; GIAMBIASI, M.; VICENTE, E.; GIMÉNEZ, G.; SPERANZA, P. Caracterización genética preliminar del Programa de Mejoramiento de Frutilla de INIA, Uruguay. MV 34 - COMUNICACIONES LIBRES - MV. MEJORAMIENTO VEGETAL In: JOURNAL OF BASIC & APPLIED GENETICS, 2016, Vol.27, Iss. 1 (Supp.). XVI LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS OF GENETICS, IV CONGRESS OF THE URUGUAYAN SOCIETY OF GENETICS, XLIX ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GENETICS SOCIETY OF CHILE, XLV ARGENTINE CONGRESS OF GENETICS, 9-12 October 2016. PROCEEDINGS. Montevideo (Uruguay): SAG, 2016. p. 297Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
50. | | VICENTE, E.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; GHELFI, B.; REGGIO, A.; VARELA, P.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; ARRUABARRENA, A.; ARES, G.; LADO, J. Los cultivares CAMBARÁ y CHAPICUY: nuevas oportunidades para la mejora de la calidad en boniato. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2016, No.44, p. 34-38. (Revista INIA; 44)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
52. | | GALVÁN, G.; VICENTE, E.; ARIAS, M.; GONZÁLEZ RABELINO, P. Selección por resistencia a Peronospora destructor en el mejoramiento genético de cebolla (Allium cepa). MV 30 - COMUNICACIONES LIBRES - MV. MEJORAMIENTO VEGETAL In: JOURNAL OF BASIC & APPLIED GENETICS, 2016, Vol.27, Iss. 1 (Supp.). XVI LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS OF GENETICS, IV CONGRESS OF THE URUGUAYAN SOCIETY OF GENETICS, XLIX ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GENETICS SOCIETY OF CHILE, XLV ARGENTINE CONGRESS OF GENETICS, 9-12 October 2016. PROCEEDINGS. Montevideo (Uruguay): SAG, 2016. p. 295Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
53. | | VICENTE, E.; ARES, G.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; VARELA, P.; BOLOGNA, F.; LADO, J. Selection of promising sweet potato clones using projective mapping. Research article. Journal of the Science of Food & Agriculture, 2017, v.97, no.1, p.158-164. Article information: Issue online: 7 November 2016 // Version of record online: 13 April 2016 // Accepted manuscript online: 9 March 2016 // Manuscript Accepted: 3 March 2016
Manuscript Revised: 29 February 2016 // Manuscript Received: 22...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
54. | | VICENTE, E.; RODRIGUEZ, G.; GHELFI, B.; REGGIO, A.; VARELA, P.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; ARRUABARRENA, A.; ARES, G. CAMBARÁ (R0871.5) y CHAPICUY (Q0714.8): nuevos cultivares de boniato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam) obtenidos por el programa de mejoramiento genético de boniato de INIA Uruguay. [119. Genética, mejoramiento y biotecnología]. In: ASAHO (ASOCIACIÓN ARGENTINA DE HORTICULTURA); CONGRESO ARGENTINO DE HORTICULTURA, 38. BAHÍA BLANCA, BS.AS. (ARGENTINA), 5 AL 8 DE OCTUBRE 2015. Resúmenes de trabajo Horticultura. Buenos Aires: ASAHO, 2015. p.121 [Abstract-Resúmen]Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
55. | | GRASSO, R.; GONZÁLEZ-ARCOS, M.; DOCAMPO, R.; GHELFI, J.; MALAQUINA, F.; VICENTE, E. Caracterización físico química de sustratos y utilización de distintas fuentes de fertilización de plantas madres para viveros de frutilla del cultivar YURÍ. [70. Tecnología del Cultivo] In: ASAHO (ASOCIACIÓN ARGENTINA DE HORTICULTURA); CONGRESO ARGENTINO DE HORTICULTURA, 38. BAHÍA BLANCA, BS.AS. (ARGENTINA), 5 AL 8 DE OCTUBRE 2015. Resúmenes de trabajo Horticultura. Buenos Aires: ASAHO, 2015. p.71 [Abstract-Resúmen]Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
56. | | ARRUABARRENA, A.; RUBIO, L.; BLANCO, O.; SCARLATO, M.; VICENTE, E.; GIMENEZ, G. Colletotrichum nymphaea, del complejo C. acutatum: re-identificación del agente causal de antracnosis de fruto en frutilla en Uruguay. In: JORNADA NACIONAL DE FITOPATOLOGÍA, 3; JORNADA NACIONAL DE PROTECCIÓN VEGETAL, 1., 3 SETIEMBRE 2015, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. Libro de Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay) : SUFIT, 2015. p.14 Financiamiento: INIA Proyecto L2: "Utilización de herramientas moleculares en el mejoramiento genético de frutilla y tomate de Uruguay".Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
60. | | COZZOLINO, D.; FASSIO, A.; RESTAINO, E.; VICENTE, E. Instrumental techniques and methods: their role in plant omics. In: Barh, D.; Khan, M.S.; Davies, E. (Eds.), 2015, PlantOmics: The Omics of Plant Science. Springer, p. 33-52. p. 33-52.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 189 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
17/08/2023 |
Actualizado : |
17/08/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CAZZULI, F.; DURANTE, M.; HIRIGOYEN, A.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; ROVIRA, P.J.; BERETTA, V.; SIMEONE, A.; JAURENA, M.; SAVIAN, J.V.; POPPI, D.; MONTOSSI, F.; LAGOMARSINO, X.; LUZARDO, S.; BRITO, G.; VELAZCO, J.I.; LATTANZI, F.; BREMM, C. |
Afiliación : |
FIORELLA CARLA CAZZULI ALBA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTÍN DURANTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay, Concepción del Uruguay 3260, Argentina; ANDRES EDUARDO HIRIGOYEN DOMINGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ, Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, PE C1A 4P3, Canada; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA BERETTA, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay; ÁLVARO SIMEONE, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú 60000, Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS POPPI, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD 4343, Australia; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XIMENA MARIA LAGOMARSINO LARRIERA, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de la Empresa, Luis Alberto de Herrera 2890, Montevideo 11300, Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ IGNACIO VELAZCO DE LOS REYES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil. |
Título : |
Beef cattle grazing native grasslands may follow three different supplement response patterns. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Grasses. 2023, Volume 2, Issue 3, pages 168-184. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses2030014 --- OPEN ACCESS. |
ISSN : |
2813-3463 (electronic). |
DOI : |
10.3390/grasses2030014 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 May 2023; Revised 1 July 2023; Accepted 13 July 2023; Published 7 August 2023. -- Academic Editor: Fabio Gresta. -- FUNDING: This research was funded by INIA Uruguay. -- LICENSE: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Previous studies on winter supplementation of growing cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands suggest that forage allowance (FA), herbage mass, and weather conditions before and during the supplementation period could all affect supplement feed efficiency (SFE)-that is, the difference or change in average daily gain (ADG) between supplemented (S) and control (C) animals (ADGchng, kg) per unit (kg) of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. In this study, we analyse data from fifteen collated winter supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 2004 and 2018. The working hypotheses of this research paper were: (i) that average substitution rates are positive, and (ii) that ADGchng is not constant throughout the supplementation period and that its variation may be attributed to sward, animal or weather variables. There were two main objectives: (i) to estimate the average supplement substitution rate (sSbR, kg forage, f, dry matter, DM intake reduction: kg supplement DM intake) and potential herbage intake substitution rate (hSbR, kg fDM intake reduction: kg fDM intake of control animals), and its association with SFE, and, (ii) to assess the existence of different phases and supplementation response patterns and its association with other relevant variables. Estimated substitution rates were always positive (sSbR = 0.3-1.1 kg/kg; hSbR = 0.1-0.3 kg/kg) and were negatively and moderately associated with SFE. Supplementation proved to be a dynamic process where three possible supplementation responses over the supplementation period were identified (linear, quadratic and Weibull). While linear patterns did not appear distinctly associated with any particular set of variables, quadratic models were mostly associated with herbage biomass and substitution rates, whereas Weibull models were the clearest in their association with frosts. Regardless of the response pattern, at the beginning of the trials it was the animals? body weight and supplement quality that most influenced supplement response, whereas towards the end, supplementation intake, supplemented animals' ADG and forage quality played a more relevant role. The estimated parameters and response patterns are expected to be used as inputs in decision support systems for livestock farmers in the future. © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. MenosABSTRACT.- Previous studies on winter supplementation of growing cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands suggest that forage allowance (FA), herbage mass, and weather conditions before and during the supplementation period could all affect supplement feed efficiency (SFE)-that is, the difference or change in average daily gain (ADG) between supplemented (S) and control (C) animals (ADGchng, kg) per unit (kg) of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. In this study, we analyse data from fifteen collated winter supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 2004 and 2018. The working hypotheses of this research paper were: (i) that average substitution rates are positive, and (ii) that ADGchng is not constant throughout the supplementation period and that its variation may be attributed to sward, animal or weather variables. There were two main objectives: (i) to estimate the average supplement substitution rate (sSbR, kg forage, f, dry matter, DM intake reduction: kg supplement DM intake) and potential herbage intake substitution rate (hSbR, kg fDM intake reduction: kg fDM intake of control animals), and its association with SFE, and, (ii) to assess the existence of different phases and supplementation response patterns and its association with other relevant variables. Estimated substitution rates were always positive (sSbR = 0.3-1.1 kg/kg; hSbR = 0.1-0.3 kg/kg) and were negatively and moderately associated with SFE. Supplementation proved to be a dynamic proces... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Concentrate supplementation; Substitution rate; Supplement feed efficiency; Supplementation response pattern. |
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
URL : |
https://www.mdpi.com/2813-3463/2/3/14/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03938naa a2200397 a 4500 001 1064290 005 2023-08-17 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2813-3463 (electronic). 024 7 $a10.3390/grasses2030014$2DOI 100 1 $aCAZZULI, F. 245 $aBeef cattle grazing native grasslands may follow three different supplement response patterns.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 3 May 2023; Revised 1 July 2023; Accepted 13 July 2023; Published 7 August 2023. -- Academic Editor: Fabio Gresta. -- FUNDING: This research was funded by INIA Uruguay. -- LICENSE: This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Previous studies on winter supplementation of growing cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands suggest that forage allowance (FA), herbage mass, and weather conditions before and during the supplementation period could all affect supplement feed efficiency (SFE)-that is, the difference or change in average daily gain (ADG) between supplemented (S) and control (C) animals (ADGchng, kg) per unit (kg) of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. In this study, we analyse data from fifteen collated winter supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 2004 and 2018. The working hypotheses of this research paper were: (i) that average substitution rates are positive, and (ii) that ADGchng is not constant throughout the supplementation period and that its variation may be attributed to sward, animal or weather variables. There were two main objectives: (i) to estimate the average supplement substitution rate (sSbR, kg forage, f, dry matter, DM intake reduction: kg supplement DM intake) and potential herbage intake substitution rate (hSbR, kg fDM intake reduction: kg fDM intake of control animals), and its association with SFE, and, (ii) to assess the existence of different phases and supplementation response patterns and its association with other relevant variables. Estimated substitution rates were always positive (sSbR = 0.3-1.1 kg/kg; hSbR = 0.1-0.3 kg/kg) and were negatively and moderately associated with SFE. Supplementation proved to be a dynamic process where three possible supplementation responses over the supplementation period were identified (linear, quadratic and Weibull). While linear patterns did not appear distinctly associated with any particular set of variables, quadratic models were mostly associated with herbage biomass and substitution rates, whereas Weibull models were the clearest in their association with frosts. Regardless of the response pattern, at the beginning of the trials it was the animals? body weight and supplement quality that most influenced supplement response, whereas towards the end, supplementation intake, supplemented animals' ADG and forage quality played a more relevant role. The estimated parameters and response patterns are expected to be used as inputs in decision support systems for livestock farmers in the future. © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 653 $aConcentrate supplementation 653 $aSubstitution rate 653 $aSupplement feed efficiency 653 $aSupplementation response pattern 700 1 $aDURANTE, M. 700 1 $aHIRIGOYEN, A. 700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J. 700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J. 700 1 $aBERETTA, V. 700 1 $aSIMEONE, A. 700 1 $aJAURENA, M. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aPOPPI, D. 700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 700 1 $aLAGOMARSINO, X. 700 1 $aLUZARDO, S. 700 1 $aBRITO, G. 700 1 $aVELAZCO, J.I. 700 1 $aLATTANZI, F. 700 1 $aBREMM, C. 773 $tGrasses. 2023, Volume 2, Issue 3, pages 168-184. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses2030014 --- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|